Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the cost of living (COL) experienced by veterinarians in the United States varied with their species emphasis. A total of 1191 entries were drawn from the American Veterinary Medical Association directory. A data set consisting of species emphasis category and addresses was systematically collected from the directory, and then cost of living indices (COLI) based on geographic locale were determined for each veterinarian using an internet-based tool. A Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance on ranks was used to determine whether COL varied among species emphasis categories for veterinarians. Species category was significantly associated with cost of living (P < 0.001): companion animal-exclusive veterinarians had significantly higher median cost of living (99) than food animal predominant (84), food animal-exclusive (89), and mixed animal veterinarians (86). Equine-exclusive veterinarians had significantly higher COLI (94) than food animal predominant and mixed animal veterinarians. The COLI for companion animal-predominant veterinarians were significantly higher (89) than food animal-predominant veterinarians (84). No other pair-wise comparisons of species category COLI differed significantly. When income was adjusted for COL ($152,398), food animal-exclusive veterinarians had greater income than all other species defined categories, and exceeded that of companion animal-exclusive veterinarians by $48,577 per year. When adjusted for COL, companion animal-exclusive incomes were lower than all other species-defined categories.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.