Abstract

Background: The police response to calls for service identified as being related to mental health continues to be highly controversial. Strategies to improve the police response include Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training and various forms of co-response models neither of which have been subjected to comprehensive evaluations, particularly as to cost-efficiency. A new approach is the use of the interRAI Brief Mental Health Screener to enhance police officer ability to identify persons with serious mental disorders. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the costs and cost efficiency of the police response to mental health calls using the interRAI Brief Mental Health Screener.Method: Secondary data was analyzed from the use of the screener from 2018 to 2020 by police officers in a mid-sized Canadian city. Changes were measured in the overall number of interactions police officers had with persons with mental health disorders, the number of incidents where police officers referred the person to hospital, and the time officers remained in the emergency department.Results: A total of 6,727 assessments were completed with involuntary referrals decreasing by 30%, and voluntary referrals by 34%. The overall time police officers were involved in involuntary referrals decreased from 123 min in 2018 to 113 min in 2020. The average emergency department wait time for voluntary referrals dropped from 41 min in 2018 to 27 min in 2020, while involuntary referrals decreased from 61 min in 2018 to 42 min in 2020. Each averted involuntary referral to the emergency department resulted in a savings of $81, on average during the study period.Conclusion: An analysis of the costs and costs savings associated with the use of the screener demonstrate that it is a worthwhile investment for police services. An additional benefit is its ability to collect mental health statistics that may be useful to police leaders to justify budgets. Future studies should attempt to devise some method of collecting pre-implementation data that would reveal the true costs and cost-efficiency of using the BMHS, which have been shown to be significant in the current study however, undoubtedly are under-estimated.

Highlights

  • During the course of their duties, police officers interact with persons exhibiting a broad range of behaviors related to mental disorder from indicators of disordered thought alone to behaviors that may pose a risk of harm to themselves or to others

  • Effort and public funds have been directed toward implementing new approaches to improve the overall police response to persons with serious mental disorders (PSMD), evaluating their overall effectiveness and cost-effectiveness has been problematic [15, 16]

  • Two major new approaches designed to help police better respond to PSMD involve providing additional training for frontline police officers and implementing co-responder models comprised of police officers and mental health professionals [15]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During the course of their duties, police officers interact with persons exhibiting a broad range of behaviors related to mental disorder from indicators of disordered thought alone to behaviors that may pose a risk of harm to themselves or to others. Effort and public funds have been directed toward implementing new approaches to improve the overall police response to persons with serious mental disorders (PSMD), evaluating their overall effectiveness and cost-effectiveness has been problematic [15, 16]. The Co-Response Team (CRT) model, referred to as the Mobile Crisis Intervention Team (MCIT) in United States, Canada and Australia and “street triage” in the United Kingdom consists of a police officer paired with a mental health professional to respond to calls for service identified as being related to mental health [19,20,21,22,23]. A new approach is the use of the interRAI Brief Mental Health Screener to enhance police officer ability to identify persons with serious mental disorders.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.