Abstract
AbstractThis article develops and analyzes patient register‐based measures of quality for the major Nordic countries. Previous studies show that Finnish hospitals have significantly higher average productivity than hospitals in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway and also a substantial variation within each country. This paper examines whether quality differences can form part of the explanation and attempts to uncover quality–cost trade‐offs.Data on costs and discharges in each diagnosis‐related group for 160 acute hospitals in 2008–2009 were collected. Patient register‐based measures of quality such as readmissions, mortality (in hospital or outside), and patient safety indices were developed and case‐mix adjusted. Productivity is estimated using bootstrapped data envelopment analysis.Results indicate that case‐mix adjustment is important, and there are significant differences in the case‐mix adjusted performance measures as well as in productivity both at the national and hospital levels. For most quality indicators, the performance measures reveal room for improvement. There is a weak but statistical significant trade‐off between productivity and inpatient readmissions within 30 days but a tendency that hospitals with high 30‐day mortality also have higher costs. Hence, no clear cost–quality trade‐off pattern was discovered. Patient registers can be used and developed to improve future quality and cost comparisons. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.