Abstract

This paper measures the welfare effects of removing the mortgage interest deduction under a variety of implementation scenarios. To this end, we build a life-cycle model with heterogeneous households calibrated to the U.S. economy, which features long-term mortgages and costly refinancing. In line with previous research, we find that most households would prefer to be born into an economy without the deductibility. However, when we incorporate transitional dynamics, less than forty percent of households are in favor of a reform and the average welfare effect is negative. This result holds under a number of removal designs.

Highlights

  • When the mortgage interest deductibility (MID) was passed into law through the Revenue Act of 1913, it was largely insignificant

  • The focus of this paper is on the transitional dynamics of repealing the MID, the answers to these questions are relevant for our purpose

  • Much less is known about how a repeal of the MID would affect current households and, in particular, how these effects depend on the design of the removal policy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When the mortgage interest deductibility (MID) was passed into law through the Revenue Act of 1913, it was largely insignificant. The direct negative effect of increasing the user cost of owner-occupied housing is more prominent, especially for relatively young households that have just entered the housing market and are highly leveraged Given that it is beneficial for the lion’s share of households to remove the MID in the long run, we explore two alternative policies that are less abrupt and give households time to adjust their asset holdings before the MID is repealed. Floetotto et al (2016) study the short-run impact of an MID repeal using a life-cycle model that includes a bequest motive In their analysis, mortgage interest deductions are claimed against earnings that are subject to a proportional labor income tax rate, and all homeowners are implicitly assumed to itemize deductions. The interest rates on mortgages and bonds are exogenous and the supply of both assets is perfectly elastic

Households
Rental market
Government
Equilibrium
The MID and the benefit of owning
Calibration
Independently calibrated parameters
Tax system
Estimated parameters
Model fit
What are the long-run effects of removing the MID?
What are the effects of an immediate removal of the MID?
Do households prefer more gradual removal policies?
An MID removal after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call