Abstract
Dynamic choices of cognitively constrained individuals have been ascribed, by the rational inattention theory, as being a filtering problem, in which the attentional intensity is consciously elected. Human attention, however, is not merely of voluntary intensity; it is rather of volitional placement nature. In this article, I study the implications of a dynamic theory of volitional attention describing individuals who choose among the alternatives that are induced by their attentional choices. Firstly, a consumer search application using US scanner data indicates that attentional choices are characterized by complementarities. Costs do not exclusively depend on the cardinality of consideration sets, but also on experience and similarities between considered items. Neglecting, thereby, attentional placement aspects potentially leads to misidentification of preference characteristics. Secondly, participation inertia in financial markets is revisited under the scope of volitional attention and a cultural-based argument of why it can be optimal not to participate is provided.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
