Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the economic implications of our previous study on the use of MR-mammography (MRM) as a solitary imaging tool in women at intermediate risk due to dense breasts.BackgroundIn our previous study, we found MRM to be a specific diagnostic tool with high accuracy in patients with dense breasts representing a patient collective at intermediate risk of breast cancer. For this study, we examined whether MRM is an economical alternative.MethodsFor the determination of outcomes and costs, a decision model based on potential diagnostic results of MRM was developed. Quality of life was estimated in a Markov chain model distinguishing between the absence of malignancy, the presence of malignancy, and death. Input parameters were utilized from the prospective TK-Study. To investigate the economic impact of MRM, overall costs in € and outcomes of MRM in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed.ResultsMRM was associated with expected costs of 1650.48 € in the 5-year period and an expected cumulative outcome of 4.69 QALYs. A true positive diagnosis resulted in significantly lower costs and a higher quality of life when compared to the consequences of a false negative result. In the deterministic sensitivity analysis, treatment costs had more impact on overall costs than the costs of MRM. The total costs per patient remained below 2500 € in the 5-year period.ConclusionMRM, as a solitary imaging tool in patients at intermediate risk due to dense breasts, is economically feasible.Key Points• In patients with dense breasts (i.e., patients at intermediate risk of breast cancer), the relative cost of MR-mammography examinations only had moderate impact on overall costs.• This is due to cost-savings through the application of a sensitive imaging technique resulting in an optimized staging and therapy planning.• MR-mammography, unaccompanied by mammography or ultrasound in patients with dense breasts, was economically feasible in our analysis.

Highlights

  • Screening women for breast cancer has been a classical domain of conventional imaging

  • Positive cases were confirmed by histology and negative cases by MR follow-ups or patient questionnaires over the 5 years in 1737 cases (sensitivity 100%; specificity 95.2%; positive predictive value (PPV) 61.3%; negative predictive value (NPV) 100%; accuracy 95.5%)

  • A timely diagnosis in patients resulted in significantly lower overall costs due to reduced treatment costs and in an expected gain of 0.67 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) when compared to a delayed diagnosis due to false negative results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Screening women for breast cancer has been a classical domain of conventional imaging. MR-mammography (MRM) today is accepted to be a highly accurate imaging technique in the detection of breast cancer [7,8,9,10,11]. It has so far not been recommended by the major breast societies as a standard technique for any other indication than patients at high risk of developing breast cancer and as an occasional problem solver [12, 13]. We found MRM to be a specific diagnostic tool with high accuracy in patients with dense breasts representing a patient collective at intermediate risk of breast cancer. We examined whether MRM is an economical alternative

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call