Abstract
BackgroundScreening program tend to recognized patients in their early stage and consequently improve health outcomes. Cost-effectiveness of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening program has been scarcely studied in developing countries. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a screening program for the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men aged over 65 years in Iran.MethodsA Markov cohort model with 11 mutually exclusive health statuses was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a population-based AAA screening program compared with a no-screening strategy. Transitions between the health statuses were simulated by using 3-month cycles. Data for disease transition probabilities and quality of life outcomes were obtained from published literature, and costs were calculated based on the price of medical services in Iran and the examination of the patients’ medical records. The outcomes were life-years gained, the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The analysis was conducted for a lifetime horizon from the payer’s perspective. Costs and effects were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. Uncertainty surrounding the model inputs was tested with deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.ResultsThe mean incremental cost of the AAA screening strategy compared with the no-screening strategy was $140 and the mean incremental QALY gain was 0.025 QALY, resulting in an ICER of $5566 ($14,656 PPP) per QALY gained. At a willingness-to-pay of 1 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita ($5628) per QALY gained, the probability of the cost-effectiveness of AAA screening was about 50%. However, at a willingness-to-pay of twice the GDP per capita per QALY gained, there was about a 95% probability for the AAA screening program to be cost-effective in Iran.ConclusionsThe results of this study showed that at a willingness-to-pay of 1 GDP per capita per QALY gained, a 1-time AAA screening program for men aged over 65 years could not be cost-effective. Nevertheless, at a willingness-to-pay of twice the GDP per capita per QALY gained, the AAA screening program could be cost-effective in Iran. Further, AAA screening in high-risk groups could be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of 1 GDP per capita per QALY gained.
Highlights
Screening program tend to recognized patients in their early stage and improve health outcomes
Given the uncertainty as to the cost-effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening in Asian countries, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a 1-time screening program for AAA in men aged over 65 years in Iran
The mean incremental cost of the AAA screening strategy compared with the no-screening strategy was $140 ($369 purchasing power parity (PPP)) and the mean incremental qualityadjusted life-year (QALY) gain was 0.025 QALY, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $5566 ($14,656 PPP) per QALY gained
Summary
Screening program tend to recognized patients in their early stage and improve health outcomes. Cost-effectiveness of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening program has been scarcely studied in developing countries. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a screening program for the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men aged over 65 years in Iran. The main agreed-upon definition of the problem is based on the diameter size of the Daroudi et al Cost Eff Resour Alloc (2021) 19:29 vessel. For an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), a diameter size of greater than 3 cm, with an increased risk for rupture, is accepted as an aneurysm [2]. 200,000 cases with AAA are diagnosed annually in the United States, with nearly 15,000 cases of this total at high risk of rupture. Only between 10 and 25% of cases with aortic rupture are likely to survive until discharge time [7,8,9]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.