Abstract
This study presents a cost-effectiveness analysis and a benefit–cost analysis (BCA) of water interventions in Bauchi State, Nigeria, with particular emphasis on pipeline and borehole (hand pump) water supply programmes. The cost-effectiveness ratios show that the borehole water programme is more cost-effective than the pipeline water programme. The results of the BCA show that both programmes are beneficial, although borehole water supply has a higher benefit–cost ratio. On the whole, the results of the cost-effectiveness and benefit–cost analyses suggest that the borehole water scheme is more efficient and sustainable.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
