Abstract

6090 Background: The phase III EORTC 24971 clinical trial (TAX 323) showed that induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy increases time to progression and improves outcomes in unresectable SCCHN patients. [Remenar et al. ASCO 2006; Abs 5516] Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin/5-FU (PF) is a standard regimen for patients with locally advanced SCCHN. The economic impact of adding docetaxel to cisplatin/5-FU (TPF) in this setting was assessed using a Markov state-transition model. Methods: The Markov model includes four health states (based on WHO criteria for measuring objective response): stable, response, progression, and death. Efficacy data from the TAX 323 clinical trial were used to derive transition probabilities between the health states. Adverse event rates were also derived from TAX 323. Data for resource utilization and costs for the UK were derived from the literature and from an advisory board of clinicians. In order to calculate quality adjusted life years (QALYs), utilities were derived by mapping the global score on the Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) to the EQ-5D. Results: Patients survived longer in the TPF arm versus PF (2.5 vs. 2.0 years). Total costs for TPF and PF were £31,203 and £26,944, respectively. The incremental discounted cost per QALY gained for TPF versus PF was £9,859/QALY, which is below the £20,000 cost-effectiveness threshold suggested by NICE as a guide to the acceptability of a technology. Conclusion: Docetaxel, when given as induction chemotherapy in combination with cisplatin/5-FU, is cost-effective compared with PF in locally advanced unresectable SCCHN patients. Treating SCCHN patients with TPF followed by radiation represents good value for money based on the results of the analysis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call