Abstract

BackgroundIn certain malignancies, patients with oligometastatic disease benefit from radical ablative or surgical treatment. The SABR-COMET trial demonstrated a survival benefit for oligometastatic patients randomized to local stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) compared to patients receiving standard care (SC) alone. Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of SABR.Materials and MethodsA decision model based on partitioned survival simulations estimated costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) associated with both strategies in a United States setting from a health care perspective. Analyses were performed over the trial duration of six years as well as a long-term horizon of 16 years. Model input parameters were based on the SABR-COMET trial data as well as best available and most recent data provided in the published literature. An annual discount of 3% for costs was implemented in the analysis. All costs were adjusted to 2019 US Dollars according to the United States Consumer Price Index. SABR costs were reported with an average of $11,700 per treatment. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $100,000/QALY.ResultsBased on increased overall and progression-free survival, the SABR group showed 0.78 incremental QALYs over the trial duration and 1.34 incremental QALYs over the long-term analysis. Treatment with SABR led to a marginal increase in costs compared to SC alone (SABR: $304,656; SC: $303,523 for 6 years; ICER $1,446/QALY and SABR: $402,888; SC: $350,708 for long-term analysis; ICER $38,874/QALY). Therapy with SABR remained cost-effective until treatment costs of $88,969 over the trial duration (i.e. 7.6 times the average cost). Sensitivity analysis identified a strong model impact for ongoing annual costs of oligo- and polymetastatic disease states.ConclusionOur analysis suggests that local treatment with SABR adds QALYs for patients with certain oligometastatic cancers and represents an intermediate- and long-term cost-effective treatment strategy.

Highlights

  • Metastatic cancers are considered incurable in a variety of tumor entities

  • Treatment with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) led to a marginal increase in costs compared to standard care (SC) alone (SABR: $304,656; SC: $303,523 for 6 years; incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) $1,446/ quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and SABR: $402,888; SC: $350,708 for long-term analysis; ICER $38,874/QALY)

  • Our analysis suggests that local treatment with SABR adds QALYs for patients with certain oligometastatic cancers and represents an intermediate- and longterm cost-effective treatment strategy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Metastatic cancers are considered incurable in a variety of tumor entities. The state of oligometastatic disease (OMD) was introduced in the mid 90s as a subcategory of metastatic cancer. Treatment options include ablative surgery, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and other local ablative procedures like thermal ablation and radioablation, which show different efficacy depending on anatomic location [4]. Considering treatment of several metastases in different locations with particularities of their anatomy and composition, SABR has proven to be a targeted treatment option with only few side effects [5, 6] and sufficient local tumor control [7]. The SABR-COMET trial demonstrated a survival benefit for oligometastatic patients randomized to local stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) compared to patients receiving standard care (SC) alone. Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of SABR

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call