Cost-effectiveness analysis of gastric cancer management using perioperative chemotherapy versus adjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Abstract

e16079 Background: The most commonly used treatment options for gastric cancer include complete resection with adequate margins with either perioperative chemotherapy (PCT) or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). While both treatment strategies have shown superiority over surgical resection alone, it is not clear which treatment strategy is more optimal. Methods: Our decision tree model was built to analyze the survival and costs associated with the two major management methods: perioperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Costs were obtained from Medicare reimbursement rates using a third-party payer perspective. Our model’s effectiveness was represented using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Our analysis tested the robustness of our conclusions by utilizing one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: PCT was the preferred treatment strategy for diagnosed gastric cancer over CRT, with a cost of $54,326.10 and 4.08 QALYs. CRT was the costliest economic strategy with a cost of $77,987.52 and 4.28 QALYs and an ICER of 115,907.48. We set a threshold of $100,000 per QALYs gained which CRT surpassed making PCT the preferred treatment modality. Over 100,000 simulations, 51.4% of simulations favored PCT. CRT became favored when CRT non-curative procedure rates rose 3% higher than PCT non-curative procedure rates and when PCT complication rates rose 15% higher than CRT complication rates. Conclusions: In our simulated patients with diagnosed gastric cancer, the most cost-effective treatment strategy was PCT. We see cost-effectiveness alternating to favor CRT with changes in non-curative procedure rates and adjuvant therapy complication rates.[Table: see text]