Abstract

BackgroundBreast cancer is the leading malignancy among Filipino women, with about 23.50% of cases characterized by human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpression. Trastuzumab, in addition to standard chemotherapy, is currently recommended as primary treatment for HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC) in the adjuvant settings, and has been listed in the Philippine National Formulary (PNF) since 2008, but with no current evidence yet on its value for money, to date. Hence, despite several policy enablers, its accessibility remains to be limited in the Philippines. We performed an economic evaluation to assess the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of adjuvant trastuzumab therapy for HER2-positive EBC in the Philippines, using healthcare system and societal perspectives, in aid of guiding coverage decisions.MethodsA Markov model-based cost-utility and budget impact analyses were conducted to estimate the total costs incurred and outcomes gained in using 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab added to standard chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy alone, over a lifetime horizon. We discounted both costs and outcomes at 3.5% per annum. Parameters were estimated using country survival data, systematic review and meta-analysis of the relative treatment effect, local and international cost data, and published utility data. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to account for parameter uncertainty.ResultsTrastuzumab therapy was dominated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at PHP 453,505 per QALY gained from a healthcare system perspective or PHP 458,686 per QALY gained from a societal perspective, with 10% cost-effectiveness probability at the country cost-effectiveness threshold of PHP 120,000 per QALY gained. National implementation will cost an additional amount of PHP 13,909 million in year one alone, plus about PHP 2000 to 3000 million annually for the succeeding fiscal years.ConclusionAt its current cost, 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab therapy compared to standard chemotherapy alone for HER2-positive EBC does not represent value for money in the Philippines. Its current cost will have to significantly lower down by one-half to achieve cost-effectiveness.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer is the leading malignancy among Filipino women, with about 23.50% of cases characterized by human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpression

  • We conducted a cost-utility analysis (CUA) using decision analytic Markov model to calculate and compare the costs and utilities of using 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab combined with standard chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for Filipino women with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC)

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis Based on a probabilistic approach, from the healthcare system perspective, trastuzumab therapy compared to chemotherapy alone was estimated to incur an additional cost of Philippine Peso (PHP) 452,128 with an expected health gain of additional 1.20 Life Year (LY) or 1.00 Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) per patient, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of PHP 377,009 per LY gained, or PHP 453,505 per QALY gained

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breast cancer is the leading malignancy among Filipino women, with about 23.50% of cases characterized by human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpression. Several key pivotal trials have demonstrated its relative treatment efficacy versus standard chemotherapy alone, in improving the disease-free and overall survival of HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. These same trials though have reported an associated increased risk for cardiotoxic effects such as congestive health failure (CHF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call