Abstract

BackgroundDapagliflozin is an antidiabetic medication that has been shown to reduce the risk of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to determine the cost-utility of add-on dapagliflozin treatment for HFrEF. MethodsAn analytical decision model was constructed to assess lifetime costs and outcomes from a healthcare system perspective. The cohort comprised HFrEF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV with an average age of 65 years. Clinical inputs were derived from the results of the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse-Outcomes in Heart Failure (DAPA-HF) trial. Risk of non-cardiovascular death data, readmission rate data, and treatment-related cost data were based on Thai population. The outcomes and costs were discounted at 3% annually. A series of sensitivity analyses were also conducted. ResultsThe increased cost of dapagliflozin add-on treatment from 17,442 THB (559 USD) to 54,405 THB (1745 USD) was associated with a QALY gain from 6.33 to 6.92 compared to standard therapy, yielding an ICER of 62,090 THB/QALY (1991 USD/QALY). Sensitivity analyses revealed that the addition of dapagliflozin to the standard treatment demonstrated an 87% cost-effectiveness strategy at a level of willingness to pay (WTP) of 160,000 THB/QALY (5131 USD/QALY). ICER was higher in non-diabetes compared to diabetes (68,304 vs 47,613 THB/QALY or 2191 vs 1527 USD/QALY). ConclusionsDapagliflozin is a cost-effective add-on therapy for patients with HFrEF at a WTP of 160,000 THB/QALY (5131 USD/QALY).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.