Abstract

The economic impact of fouling in spiral wound membranes is not yet well explored. There has been an established assumption that the cost of fouling in membrane processes is significant, but this hypothesis has not been thoroughly evaluated. We conducted an economic analysis on seven full-scale installations, four nanofiltration (NF) and three reverse osmosis (RO), to estimate the cost of fouling in industrial plants. The cost of fouling was calculated in detail, including costs of increase in feed channel pressure drop, water permeability reduction, early membrane replacement, and extensive cleaning-in-place (CIP). The estimated cost of fouling was expressed as a fraction of operational expenses (OPEX) for each plant and the major cost factors in fouling and CIP costs were identified.The selected NF plants were fed with anoxic ground water, while the feed water to RO plants was either surface water or municipal wastewater effluent. All the NF plants produce drinking water, while the RO plants produce demineralized water for industrial applications. We found that the cost of fouling in the RO plants was around 24% of OPEX, while the fouling related costs in NF cases was only around 11% due to the low biofouling potential of the anoxic ground water. The major factor in the cost of fouling is the early membrane replacement cost, followed by additional energy and with only a minor contribution from the cleaning costs. The down-time cost (caused by the interruption of water production during a CIP event) can be the major CIP cost factor for the plants with frequent cleaning events, while the cost of chemicals dominates in the plants with non-frequent CIP. In case of manual cleaning-in-place, the cost of fouling is increased by around 2% for the RO plants with frequent CIP. The manual execution of CIP cleaning is an attention point to reconsider, as the reviewed plants hold an automated CIP cleaning, providing membrane productivity advantages.

Highlights

  • There has been extensive research on fouling and its impacts on membrane processes nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO)

  • We found that the cost of fouling in the RO plants was around 24% of operational expenses (OPEX), while the fouling related costs in NF cases was only around 11% due to the low biofouling potential of the anoxic ground water

  • Seven water production plants were compared in this study: four using nanofiltration and three using reverse osmosis processes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been extensive research on fouling and its impacts on membrane processes nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO). Many studies have been dedicated to fouling mitigation [24,25,26] and control mechanisms [27,28]. There has been a strong effort to develop anti-fouling membranes through surface modification to control fouling formation [24,36]. Many studies were dedicated to the development of optimal feed spacers [37] and pre-treatment steps [38] to control and mitigate fouling. Mathematical models have been developed to improve under­ standing of fouling mechanism and predict the fouling impacts on membrane performance [39,40,41]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.