Abstract

Our knowledge of discount rates plays an important role both in the discounted cash flow decision-making process and in the later phases of a project’s lifetime. It is useful than both for management and cash-flow monitoring purposes at operating stages. Investors putting money into power generation projects expect an appropriate rate of return to compensate them for a minimum acceptable real return available in the market (risk-free rate of interest) and the project’s specific risk. Due to its essential nature in the financial and economic evaluation of projects (it is the only parameter that reflects the risk), it is reasonable to assume that investors would also be interested in constituent components of that indicator. The discount rate is one parameter in the discounted cash flow analysis that takes into account the risk of a venture. Further, the previous research in this area has focused mainly on the dimension of this variable, and the structure of this parameter has not been dealt with any other studies. The proposed idea of this study met the expectations of the industry—it aimed to present a typical project implemented in the energy industry, a relatively simple methodology that allowed estimating the components within the cost of equity capital of the enterprise. In the power generation sector, one can find various types of discount rates—assessed for multiple technologies, at different development stages, and expressed differently. Owing to the know-how and decades-long experience, coal-fired power projects’ remarks may be a good benchmark for alternative low carbon technologies. That is why, in this work, a discount rate for valuing investment in new coal-fired power projects was evaluated. This assessment was made on the “bare-bones” assumption, meaning evaluations at 100% equity, after-tax, in constant (real) currency units. The analysis of the discount rate structure was performed by applying the procedure of the classical sensitivity analysis having the accuracy of key input parameters. Finally, the risk factors within the risk-adjusted discount rate were calculated. The obtained results showed the importance of individual risk factors within the risk-adjusted discount rate used in coal energy projects, which would enable a more pragmatic approach to controlling this parameter by decision-makers and understanding the risk.

Highlights

  • Despite the existence of alternative methods of assessing the effectiveness of investment projects, e.g., real options valuation (ROV), discounted cash-flow analysis (DCF) remains an essential tool in Energies 2020, 13, 4833; doi:10.3390/en13184833 www.mdpi.com/journal/energiesEnergies 2020, 13, 4833 the fuel and energy sector, allowing for making investment decisions and, effective management of projects

  • Dranka et al [2], Hemerlink, de Jager [3], etc.). This method is based on money as a universal medium of exchange, assuming that making an investment decision is only rational if sufficiently a high return is expected on the invested cash over a certain period

  • (lignite)—probably in nominal values; it is worth mentioning that both these companies have geological-mining assets in their portfolios, in addition to power generation assets; Bachner, Mayer, and Steininger [33] estimated the cost of capital for investments in coal-fired units in Eastern Europe at just over 10%, in nominal terms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dranka et al [2], Hemerlink, de Jager [3], etc.) This method is based on money as a universal medium of exchange, assuming that making an investment decision is only rational if sufficiently a high return is expected on the invested cash over a certain period. It should be stressed that the DCF analysis requires a broad set of reliable data in terms of forecasts of investment outlays, prices, costs, and production volumes. This method is used at the planning stage to assess the effectiveness of projects analyzed in the pre-feasibility, feasibility, and operational phases. The parameter that expresses the risk that the situation may develop differently from what is expected is the cost of capital, called the discount rate, as presented by Andrén and Jankensgård [5]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.