Cost of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Tertiary Medical Center

Abstract

BackgroundRevision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) involves varying levels of case complexity and costs depending on the following: (1) number of components revised, (2) duration of operating room time, and (3) length of hospital stay. However, the cost associated with different types of aseptic TKA revisions, based on number and type of components revised, is not well described. We sought to determine differences in cost associated with different revision types, and to correlate this with average national hospital and surgeon reimbursement based on current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. MethodsThis is a retrospective review of aseptic revision TKAs performed at a single tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2018. Patient demographic data, operating room time, and direct surgery and total hospital costs obtained from an internal accounting database (Enterprise Performance Systems, Inc) were collected. Patients were stratified by the components revised (polyethylene liner only, tibia only, femur only, or both femur and tibia). We hypothesized that direct surgery and total hospital costs would increase as case complexity increased from poly exchange to single-component revisions and both-component revisions. ResultsIn total, 106 patients were included (19 poly exchanges, 10 tibia-only revisions, 13 femur-only revisions, and 64 both-component revisions). Operating room time was significantly lower for poly exchange than all other groups (P < .001). Direct surgery and total hospital costs were significantly lower for poly exchange than all other groups (P < .001), and were significantly lower for tibia-only and femur-only revisions compared to both-component revisions (P < .001). Average national surgeon reimbursement by Medicare decreased as a percentage of direct surgery cost as case complexity increased from poly exchange to tibia-only, femur-only, and both-component revisions. Total hospital cost per average Diagnosis Related Group weight was lowest for single-component revisions and highest for both-component revision. ConclusionThere are significant differences in cost associated with aseptic TKA revisions based on number and type of components revised. These differences may not be accurately reflected in reimbursement, and often represent a burden to those who treat complex revisions.