Cost-effectiveness of triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate compared with dual therapy for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Canada

Abstract

RATIONALE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with significant economic and societal burden in Canada. For patients whose symptoms remain uncontrolled with dual therapies including long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA)/long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists (LABA) or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/LABA, step-up to triple-therapy with ICS/LAMA/LABA is recommended. Budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) is an ICS/LAMA/LABA therapy with demonstrated efficacy compared to dual therapies in pivotal phase 3 trials (ETHOS and KRONOS). OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to conduct a cost-utility analysis to compare BGF with dual therapies (ICS/LABA and LAMA/LABA) for patients with COPD requiring escalation to triple therapy. METHODS A Markov cohort-based cost-utility analysis was conducted over a 30-year time horizon from a public payer perspective, to compare costs and outcomes in patients with COPD requiring escalation from dual therapy to triple therapy. The analysis was based on data from the ETHOS trial, Canadian administrative data, and published sources. Health states were characterized by forced expiratory volume (FEV1) severity and exacerbations (none, moderate, severe). RESULTS Over a 30-year time horizon in probabilistic analysis across several scenario analyses, BGF was associated with modest but consistent benefits to overall costs ($40,406 total for BGF, $40,685 for LAMA/LABAs and $43,261 for ICS/LABAs), as well as life years and quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) gained compared to dual therapies (8.7 total QALYs for BGF triple therapy, 8.5 for LAMA/LABAs and 8.4 for ICS/LABAs). CONCLUSIONS From a Canadian public healthcare perspective, BGF is associated with both cost-savings and improved health benefits compared with dual therapies for maintenance treatment of COPD patients at risk of exacerbations. These results may help to inform optimal decision-making.