Cost-effectiveness of ipilimumab versus high-dose interferon as an adjuvant therapy in resected high-risk melanoma.

Abstract

BackgroundAdjuvant ipilimumab was found to improve the overall survival and reduce toxicity compared to high‐dose interferon (HDI) in patients with resected, high‐risk melanoma. However, the cost of ipilimumab is substantially higher than HDI. This study evaluates the cost‐effectiveness of ipilimumab as an adjuvant treatment in melanoma from a healthcare perspective.MethodsWe designed a Markov model simulating resected, high‐risk melanoma patients receiving either ipilimumab or HDI. Transition probabilities, including risks of survival, disease progression, and toxicity, were ascertained from clinical trial data. Costs and quality of life measurements (health utilities) were extracted from the literature. Incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs), defined as incremental costs divided by incremental quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs), assessed cost‐effectiveness. ICERs <$100,000/QALY were deemed cost‐effective. We measured model uncertainty with one‐way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.ResultsIn our base case model, ipilimumab increased costs by $107,100 and increased effectiveness by 0.43 QALY, yielding an ICER of $392,600/QALY. Our model was moderately sensitive to the costs of ipilimumab, though the cost of ipilimumab would need to decrease by 44% for ipilimumab to become cost‐effective compared to HDI. The model was not sensitive to survival, toxicity, or other costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that HDI would remain the cost‐effective treatment option 96.2% of the time at a willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $100,000/QALY.ConclusionsAdjuvant ipilimumab increases the survival and decreases the toxicity compared to HDI in resected, high‐risk melanoma patients, though this would not be considered cost‐effective due to the high price of ipilimumab.