Abstract

Purpose The cost-effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and combined sandwich therapy in the treatment of staghorn calculi was examined. Materials and Methods The cost-effective index, which estimates the average cost of making 1 patient stone-free, was computed for the various treatment options. Data for effectiveness of each therapy were used as available from the literature. Billing charges were used as cost data from University Hospital and the Kidney Stone Center. Results Average charges for a single percutaneous nephrolithotomy were $26,622, of which 81 percent were facility charges and 7.9 percent urologist fees. Average charges for a single shock wave lithotripsy were $8,213, 60.3 percent of which were facility fees and 33.3 percent of which were urologist charges. Overall, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and combined sandwich therapy were more cost-effective than shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy. When the stone surface area was less than 500 mm. [2] combined sandwich therapy and shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy were equally cost-effective. However, when the stone burden was greater than 500 mm. [2] combined sandwich therapy clearly became more cost-effective than shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy. Conclusions Percutaneous nephrolithotomy followed by shock wave lithotripsy, if necessary, and second look nephroscopy are the most cost-effective methods of treating staghorn calculi.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.