Cost-effectiveness of capsule endoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer

Abstract

Capsule endoscopy (Pillcam Colon) has recently shown acceptable accuracy in detecting colonic lesions when compared with colonoscopy. The aim of this analysis is to provide a model to assess the cost and effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) using capsule endoscopy and to compare the cost-effectiveness with that of a colonoscopy screening program. The cost-effectiveness of two screening strategies using colonoscopy or capsule endoscopy were compared by a computer model based on a Markov process. In this model, a hypothetical population of 100,000 individuals aged 50 years and over, undergoes a 10 yearly screening procedure. Different thresholds for postcapsule polypectomy referral were simulated. At baseline, the incremental cost-effectiveness (compared with no screening) of colonoscopy and capsule endoscopy was $ 16,165 and $ 29,244 per life-year saved, respectively. When equal compliance was simulated, the colonoscopy program was more effective and less costly than a strategy based on capsule endoscopy. When simulating an initial compliance to capsule endoscopy 30% better than colonoscopy, capsule endoscopy became the more effective and more cost-effective option. A 20% better compliance was sufficient when a higher accuracy of capsule endoscopy for polyps was assumed. A 6 mm threshold for polypectomy referral was associated with a substantial cost reduction in the capsule endoscopy program with only a small loss of efficacy. The cost-effectiveness of capsule endoscopy depends mainly on its ability to improve compliance to CRC screening.