Cost-effectiveness of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer (EBC) – a German health economic analysis.

Abstract

Abstract Abstract #6109 Background: The non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen in terms of efficacy and safety in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (EBC). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anastrozole versus tamoxifen from the German health care perspective.
 Methods: A probabilistic Markov model was developed using data from the published literature and expert opinion to project trial outcomes to 25 years based on a cohort of 1000 postmenopausal women with HR+ EBC. Resource use data and costs were obtained from standard sources and expert opinion. Utility scores for the different heath states were obtained from a patient-based utility study using the standard gamble technique. Results were expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Costs and benefits were discounted at 5% annually.
 Results: Total costs over the 25 year period for anastrozole and tamoxifen were €12,422 and €6,757, respectively. The cost per life year (LY) for anastrozole compared to tamoxifen was €24,822/LY gained. The ICER of anastrozole compared to tamoxifen was €21,050/QALY gained (95% CI €9,841 - €62,344). The result remained robust to all parameters tested in the sensitivity analysis. Cost-effectiveness probability curves indicated a >90% probability that the cost per QALY gained with anastrozole would be <€42,000.
 Conclusions: In this model, five years of adjuvant anastrozole is a cost-effective treatment alternative to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with HR+ EBC from the German health care perspective. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6109.