Abstract

We performed an economic evaluation using a decision-tree model to analyze the relative cost effectiveness from the United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) perspective of two different methods of tonsillectomy (traditional total tonsillectomy and partial intracapsular) for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Procedural costs were drawn from published literature and Medicare values. Effectiveness and probabilities were drawn from medical literature. Primary intervention was monopolar-technique total tonsillectomy or microdebrider-assisted partial intracapsular tonsillectomy. Secondary interventions included operative control of hemorrhage, treatment of severe dehydration, or revision tonsillectomy. The decision model starts with pediatric patients with OSA, choosing between total and partial tonsillectomy. Outcomes were measured by costs (US dollars), effectiveness [quality-adjusted life year (QALY)], and a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$100,000/QALY. Base case analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. Primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for each of the two tonsillectomy techniques. Base case analysis demonstrated that total tonsillectomy was more cost effective at US$12,453.40 per QALY gained. In PSA, 82.84% of the simulations show total tonsillectomy to be the more cost-effective strategy. Deterministic sensitivity analyses showed that when the rate of OSA recurrence is lower than 3.12%, partial tonsillectomy would be more cost effective. When the failure rate of partial tonsillectomy is below 1.0%, it is more cost effective even when total tonsillectomy is 100% successful. Study results suggest that overall monopolar-technique total tonsillectomy is more cost effective. However, with varying adjustments for disutility caused by procedural complications, intracapsular tonsillectomy could become a more cost-effective technique for treating pediatric OSA.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.