Abstract
Recent advancements in treatment have improved the prognosis of hematologic malignancies. However, the increasing cost of therapeutic drugs has become an urgent issue. Cost-effectiveness analysis is performed using the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER), a value calculated by dividing the incremental cost by the incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The ICER must be compared with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold, which differs between countries. Since the analysis should be made over a long time horizon, it is necessary to model and extrapolate the long-term outcomes of clinical trials to calculate cumulative costs and QALYs. This article discusses several approaches to cost-effectiveness analysis for chronic myelogenous leukemia, multiple myeloma, and CAR-T therapy. As even expensive treatments could be cost-effective if they provide long treatment-free survival, it is essential to judge cost-effectiveness by an appropriate method, rather than price alone.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
