Abstract
It is generally accepted that renal transplantation as a routine therapy for terminal stage renal patients has various medical advantages over chronic haemodialysis. A comparison of costs of both types of treatment clearly demonstrates a considerable difference also in favour of the former. This comparison is based on patient data from the Leyden University Hospital and on the tarrifs agreed upon by the Dutch Public Health Insurance Companies for haemodialysis treatment in 1973. (In this article only cost of center dialysis has been compared with cost of transplantation. In Holland, so far, no comparable data on the cost of home dialysis are available.) Renal transplantation, including 12 months of post-operative care, requires some Dfl. 45,000 (or + 18,000) whereas one year of chronic center haemodialysis cost Dfl. 65,000 (or + 26,000). The cost of treatment of a patient with a well-functioning graft in the second and following years normally does not exceed Dfl. 8,000 (or + 3,200) per year. These figures demonstrate the enormous economic advantage of transplantation as compared to chronic center haemodialysis, and that together with the medical advantages of transplantation should be sufficient reason to promote transplantation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.