Abstract
Defense of an area has often been suggested to be more likely when the area contains critical resources which are available more continously, more reliably, or in greater concentration. We report a case in which field experiments and observations of two closely related primate species do not support these expectations. Among other possibilities, the results may indicate conflicting strategies of spacing between males and females.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
