Abstract
AbstractPedestrian facility size is currently determined in direct relationship to the design level of service. However, the design level of service is chosen arbitrarily from the six levels of service, which are assumed to represent the freedom available for movement at different levels of pedestrian flow. This direct and simple approach to facility sizing is shown to have two fundamental deficiencies that contribute to wasteful over capacity. In this article, a cost‐based approach is introduced to overcome the deficiencies. Two analytical models, one for determining optimal design density and another for determining optimal design flow, are presented. The optimum design parameters minimize the total cost of the facility defined as the sum of construction cost and user cost. The sensitivity of the optimum parameters to the cost and pedestrian flow parameters is demonstrated using a numerical example.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.