Abstract
ABSTRACTSelection of the optimal material handling system is one of the most significant decisions to be made in mineral industries. Rapid economic changes and technological improvements make cost analysis a complicated process. On the other hand, current low commodity prices have put a greater emphasis on cost reduction and process optimization to ensure viability of mining projects. In this article, two material handling systems, a semimobile in-pit crusher and conveyor systems (IPCC) and traditional truck and shovel systems (TS), are compared through the cost analysis of an iron ore prefeasibility study. Furthermore, robustness of the design parameters is evaluated through a sensitivity analysis to determine the relative importance of project parameters. Finally, risks associated with uncertain design parameters affecting cost analysis are assessed through Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicated that IPCC is more cost effective than TS.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
