Abstract

In this paper we analyze a continuous review, lost sales (S−1,S) inventory system with two demand classes—high priority and low priority. We compare two different policies—one where the two classes of customers are treated exactly alike and the other where a threshold rationing policy is used. We prove that under certain conditions there is a sub-optimal rationing policy which yields a lower cost for the supplier and higher service levels for both the high priority and low priority customers than the optimal policy where the two customers are treated alike.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call