Abstract
Cosmopolitics is growing as an alternative to identity battles, a critical form of cosmopolitanism. This contribution claims that such an alternative will only be feasible with individuals as dialogical selves. Ethnographic interviews with Muslims and Christians of different generations yield insights into their notions of personhood. Different notions of person are then checked against the new predicament of cosmopolitics in urban settings. The traditional notion of ‘full person’ can be distinguished from that of ‘partial persons’, subjacent to the views of the dialogical self. Educational and social benefits of the ‘partial person’ concept are outlined. Qualitative research into the perception of the person as a ‘partial person’ opens the way to an appreciation of the dialogical self approach, especially in the context of an ever more urbanized humanity. Against that background, cosmopolitics is being re-discussed as a possible avenue for a global society.Keywords: cosmopolitics, dialogical self, intercultural learning.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
