Abstract

To understand the historical dynamics of the cosmopolitan Indian Ocean region requires a comparative engagement with both the notions of cosmopolitanism and creolization. Although both presuppose patterns of movement and degrees of mixing, the nouns cosmopolitan and Creole and the realities they connote are likely to be seen as polar opposites, belonging to incommensurable coordinates of time and space. The challenge is to bring into dialogue intellectual histories that have been viewed as distinct, since the idea of the cosmopolis evokes a highly literate, urbane, and enlightened polity, whereas the oral cultures of a Creole world tend to be associated with superstition and primitive rituals. If we rethink cosmopolitanism and creolization from the perspective of the insular regions of the Indian Ocean, new possibilities emerge for comparison and redefinition of what it means to be a Creole cosmopolitan who participates actively in the construction of cultural meanings through technologies of oral, print,...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.