Abstract

In this talk I focus on how the modelling of the mass-observable relation and the halo mass function can impact the accuracy and precision of cosmological constraints inferred from galaxy clusters. I present a new analysis of clusters detected in mm wavelengths by the Planck satellite, highlighting the need of an improved description and calibration for the mass-observable relation. I also discuss how to improve our analysis in view of future cluster surveys, with a particular focus on the impact of the halo mass function calibration and the need for a universal definition.

Highlights

  • Galaxy clusters are the largest, gravitationally bound structures in the Universe

  • In this talk I focus on how the modelling of the mass-observable relation and the halo mass function can impact the accuracy and precision of cosmological constraints inferred from galaxy clusters

  • We focus on how different modelling and assumptions for scaling relations and mass function can largely impact the constraints on cosmological parameters inferred from cluster number counts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Galaxy clusters are the largest, gravitationally bound structures in the Universe. They are associated with peaks in the matter density field on megaparsec scales. We rely on observables that act as massproxies and that tightly correlate with the underlying cluster mass, via some statistical scaling relation. The calibration of the scaling relations represents the current limiting systematic in cluster cosmology studies and it is usually referred to as the “masscalibration problem". In this analysis, we consider at first clusters detected in the mm-wavelengths, through the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich (tSZ) effect [2], by the Planck satellite [3, 4]. We focus on how different modelling and assumptions for scaling relations and mass function can largely impact the constraints on cosmological parameters inferred from cluster number counts. We comment on how these differences affect the possible tension with other cosmological probe, e.g. the σ8 discrepancy between tSZ clusters and cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary anisotropies

Mass-observable relation calibration
Combining tSZ observables
Improving the mass bias definition
Halo mass function calibration
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.