Abstract

It is fair to say that religion, and in particular the ways in which some Christian and Islamic thinkers have again begun to encroach on the domain of science (e.g., global warming, the teaching of evolution), has caused a great deal of consternation within the scientific and philosophical communities. An understandable reaction to these developments is to reject out of hand even the slightest taint of religion in these fields—a position that has now attained the status of orthodoxy, at least in the western world. This is curious on its face, given the fact that religion has clearly provided a sense of meaning and purpose for most of our fellow humans as long as there have been humans pondering such things. Moreover, it is probably not necessary, provided one is very careful what sort of faith one endorses. Thus, the basic question I wish to address here, albeit in a very preliminary fashion, is whether it may be possible to delineate a form of faith that can inspire and guide humanity without the metaphysical baggage that causes conflict with epistemically conservative disciplines like science. To that end, I examine one recent thread within cosmology that views the universe as creative in the sense that it is biased towards the production of ever-increasing complexity at its edges. If that is true, it gives those so inclined permission, as it were, to view the creation of complexity (including human culture and its products) as a moral good (perhaps even an imperative) without the assumption of supernatural entities with mysterious motives and goals. After arguing that there is indeed logical space for such a faith that does not impinge on the essential commitments of either science or philosophy (properly conceived) I will examine its potential use in framing some of the emerging debates concerning space exploration. The prospect of humanity venturing beyond our homeworld in the near future offers an excellent case study of this “neo-naturalism” in action for two basic reasons. First, it seems likely that such a massive and complex undertaking needs a motivational source beyond mere discovery and expansion. Second, a neo-natural faith may influence how we go about this, and not always in ways those steeped in more traditional approaches to religion would predict.

Highlights

  • The basic claim of this paper is that there are good reasons for both science and religion to compromise on their traditional positions, as well as logical space for such compromise to result in a new kind of “neo-rational” faith.1 As with any faith claim, the truth of neo-rationalism is not established by the empirical evidence

  • After arguing that there is logical space for such a faith that does not impinge on the essential commitments of either science or philosophy I will examine its potential use in framing some of the emerging debates concerning space exploration

  • Religions 2020, 11, 659 out the basic motivation for neo-rationalism, I will turn to the new science of astrobiology to show neo-rationalism’s potential to help us think about the many social and ethical issues this field brings to the fore

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The basic claim of this paper is that there are good reasons for both science and religion to compromise on their traditional positions, as well as logical space for such compromise to result in a new kind of “neo-rational” faith. As with any faith claim, the truth of neo-rationalism is not established by the empirical evidence. A rabbi once asked me why I chose to make reason rather than love the sine qua non of moral value (something I am still pondering) and I have been impressed with the highly abstract concept of God expressed by some Catholic theologians working on the search for alien life From such experiences, as well as my own personal exploration of Buddhist thought, I have come to the conclusion that faith traditions can do much to enrich science. I have written about these ideas for social scientists (Smith 2015) and the physical scientists and engineers who compose the bulk of the space science community (Smith Forthcoming), but here my aim is primarily to address the faith community This is a new experience for me, and I must beg the reader’s indulgence with what will undoubtedly be many imprecisions and oversimplifications. Despite these shortcomings, the tentative ideas I put forward here inspire further discussion and debate, the experiment will have been a success

Where Science Goes too Far
Where Religion Goes too Far
A Creative Universe?
Neo-Naturalism
Neo-Rationalism in the Context of Astrobiology
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call