Abstract

ObjectivesThis experiment investigated the extent to which independent action observation, independent motor imagery and combined action observation and motor imagery of a sport-related motor skill elicited activity within the motor system. Design and methodEighteen, right-handed, male participants engaged in four conditions following a repeated measures design. The experimental conditions involved action observation, motor imagery, or combined action observation and motor imagery of a basketball free throw, whilst the control condition involved observation of a static image of a basketball player holding a basketball. In all conditions, single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered to the forearm representation of the left motor cortex. The amplitude of the resulting motor evoked potentials were recorded from the flexor carpi ulnaris and extensor carpi ulnaris muscles of the right forearm and used as a marker of corticospinal excitability. ResultsCorticospinal excitability was facilitated significantly by combined action observation and motor imagery of the basketball free throw, in comparison to both the action observation and control conditions. In contrast, the independent use of either action observation or motor imagery did not facilitate corticospinal excitability compared to the control condition. ConclusionsThe findings have implications for the design and delivery of action observation and motor imagery interventions in sport. As corticospinal excitability was facilitated by the use of combined action observation and motor imagery, researchers should seek to establish the efficacy of implementing combined action observation and motor imagery interventions for improving motor skill performance and learning in applied sporting settings.

Highlights

  • Flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) Extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) Mean motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. The aim of this experiment was to establish the effects of different action observation and motor imagery conditions on corticospinal excitability for a sport-related motor skill

  • The amplitude of MEPs obtained during AOMI, independent Action observation (AO) and independent motor imagery (MI) of a basketball free throw task were compared against a control condition

  • MEP amplitudes were significantly larger during AOMI, compared to both the control condition and the independent AO condition

Read more

Summary

Objectives

This experiment investigated the extent to which independent action observation, independent motor imagery and combined action observation and motor imagery of a sport-related motor skill elicited activity within the motor system. The amplitude of the resulting motor evoked potentials were recorded from the flexor carpi ulnaris and extensor carpi ulnaris muscles of the right forearm and used as a marker of corticospinal excitability. Results: Corticospinal excitability was facilitated significantly by combined action observation and motor imagery of the basketball free throw, in comparison to both the action observation and control conditions. The independent use of either action observation or motor imagery did not facilitate corticospinal excitability compared to the control condition. Conclusions: The findings have implications for the design and delivery of action observation and motor imagery interventions in sport. As corticospinal excitability was facilitated by the use of combined action observation and motor imagery, researchers should seek to establish the efficacy of implementing combined action observation and motor imagery interventions for improving motor skill performance and learning in applied sporting settings

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call