Cortical Trajectory versus Traditional Pedicle Screw Trajectory in Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Complications and Clinical Outcomes

Abstract

BackgroundLumbar degenerative disease imposes a substantial burden on global healthcare expenditures. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) utilizing either traditional trajectory (TT) pedicle screws or cortical bone trajectory (CT) pedicle screws have become increasingly common. This meta-analysis evaluates the outcomes and safety of open TLIF with TT compared to CT. MethodsPubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were explored until April 2024. The studied outcomes included complications, revision surgeries, operative room (OR) time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), incision length, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. ResultsFive studies were included in this meta-analysis. A total of 770 patients undergoing TLIF were included, with 415 in the CT group and 355 in the TT group. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of overall complications, including specific complications, the rate of revision surgeries, PROMS scores, OR time, and EBL. However, the CT group demonstrated shorter LOS (p=0.05), and shorter incision lengths (p<.001) compared to the TT group. ConclusionBoth TT and CT techniques in TLIF procedures demonstrated comparable rates of complications, reoperations, and PROMs. Despite similar OR times and EBL, the CT group exhibited shorter incision lengths, and shorter LOS compared to the TT group. Both cortical and traditional trajectory pedicle screws are safe and effective options for TLIF. There are potential benefits to CT such as shorter incision and LOS, although TT remains an essential tool for spinal instrumentation techniques.