Abstract

Understanding speech in background noise is a difficult task. The tracking of speech rhythms such as the rate of syllables and words by cortical activity has emerged as a key neural mechanism for speech-in-noise comprehension. In particular, recent investigations have used transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) with the envelope of a speech signal to influence the cortical speech tracking, demonstrating that this type of stimulation modulates comprehension and therefore providing evidence of a functional role of the cortical tracking in speech processing. Cortical activity has been found to track the rhythms of a background speaker as well, but the functional significance of this neural response remains unclear. Here we use a speech-comprehension task with a target speaker in the presence of a distractor voice to show that tACS with the speech envelope of the target voice as well as tACS with the envelope of the distractor speaker both modulate the comprehension of the target speech. Because the envelope of the distractor speech does not carry information about the target speech stream, the modulation of speech comprehension through tACS with this envelope provides evidence that the cortical tracking of the background speaker affects the comprehension of the foreground speech signal. The phase dependency of the resulting modulation of speech comprehension is, however, opposite to that obtained from tACS with the envelope of the target speech signal. This suggests that the cortical tracking of the ignored speech stream and that of the attended speech stream may compete for neural resources.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Loud environments such as busy pubs or restaurants can make conversation difficult. However, they also allow us to eavesdrop into other conversations that occur in the background. In particular, we often notice when somebody else mentions our name, even if we have not been listening to that person. However, the neural mechanisms by which background speech is processed remain poorly understood. Here we use transcranial alternating current stimulation, a technique through which neural activity in the cerebral cortex can be influenced, to show that cortical responses to rhythms in the distractor speech modulate the comprehension of the target speaker. Our results provide evidence that the cortical tracking of background speech rhythms plays a functional role in speech processing.

Highlights

  • Speech is a fascinatingly complex signal, whose processing requires analysis of individual phonemes, syllables, and words to extract meaning

  • We found that tACS with the target envelope erate deviation in the phase shift of the lowest comprehension resulted in a significant modulation (Fig. 2C; Table 1). score might be explained by the different number of phase shifts

  • P value lope influenced speech comprehension, providing evidence that the cortical tracking of the ignored speaker plays a functional role in speech processing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Speech is a fascinatingly complex signal, whose processing requires analysis of individual phonemes, syllables, and words to extract meaning When confronted with background noise such as other people talking, traffic or music, our brain must first segregate the target speech signal from the background acoustics before the processing of the target speech stream can begin (Bregman, 1994; Snyder and Alain, 2007). A background speech signal in a listener’s native language is more distracting than speech in a foreign language or nonspeech sounds such as music or traffic (Brungart, 2001; Cooke et al, 2008; Cooke and Lu, 2010). The neural encoding of a background speech signal remains poorly understood

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.