Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the nervous system for therapeutic purposes, such as deep brain stimulation in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, has been used for decades. Recently, increased attention has focused on using microstimulation to restore functions as diverse as somatosensation and memory. However, how microstimulation changes the neural substrate is still not fully understood. Microstimulation may cause cortical changes that could either compete with or complement natural neural processes, and could result in neuroplastic changes rendering the region dysfunctional or even epileptic. As part of our efforts to produce neuroprosthetic devices and to further study the effects of microstimulation on the cortex, we stimulated and recorded from microelectrode arrays in the hand area of the primary somatosensory cortex (area 1) in two awake macaque monkeys. We applied a simple neuroprosthetic microstimulation protocol to a pair of electrodes in the area 1 array, using either random pulses or pulses time-locked to the recorded spiking activity of a reference neuron. This setup was replicated using a computer model of the thalamocortical system, which consisted of 1980 spiking neurons distributed among six cortical layers and two thalamic nuclei. Experimentally, we found that spike-triggered microstimulation induced cortical plasticity, as shown by increased unit-pair mutual information, while random microstimulation did not. In addition, there was an increased response to touch following spike-triggered microstimulation, along with decreased neural variability. The computer model successfully reproduced both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the experimental findings. The physiological findings of this study suggest that even simple microstimulation protocols can be used to increase somatosensory information flow.

Highlights

  • Electrical neural stimulation has been used in a wide variety of clinical and experimental applications [1,2,3,4]

  • We developed a computer model of microstimulation in the thalamocortical system, based on a recently developed spiking-neuron network model [42]

  • Electrical stimulation was delivered at 10 sites between the two subjects (JK, N = 4; AC8, N = 6)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Electrical neural stimulation has been used in a wide variety of clinical and experimental applications [1,2,3,4]. Microstimulation in primary somatosensory cortex (S1) has been used to deliver behaviorally relevant information to both humans [5] and animals [1,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Sensations lost due to disease, injury, or trauma could be restored by microstimulation in primary somatosensory cortex [6,7,9,12,14] or thalamus [15,16,17,18,19]. LealCampanario et al [20] showed that rabbits were unable to distinguish between physical whisker stimulation and electrical stimulation of the vibrissae area of primary sensory cortex. Microstimulation has recently been shown to ‘‘hijack’’ natural motor intent [27]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call