Abstract

Key points The cortical mechanisms of grasping have been extensively studied in macaques and humans; here, we investigated whether common marmosets could rely on similar mechanisms despite strong differences in hand morphology and grip diversity.We recorded electrocorticographic activity over the sensorimotor cortex of two common marmosets during the execution of different grip types, which allowed us to study cortical activity (power spectrum) and physiologically inferred connectivity (phase‐slope index).Analyses were performed in beta (16–35 Hz) and gamma (75–100 Hz) frequency bands and our results showed that beta power varied depending on grip type, whereas gamma power displayed clear epoch‐related modulation.Strength and direction of inter‐area connectivity varied depending on grip type and epoch.These findings suggest that fundamental control mechanisms are conserved across primates and, in future research, marmosets could represent an adequate model to investigate primate brain mechanisms. The cortical mechanisms of grasping have been extensively studied in macaques and humans. Here, we investigated whether common marmosets could rely on similar mechanisms despite striking differences in manual dexterity. Two common marmosets were trained to grasp‐and‐pull three objects eliciting different hand configurations: whole‐hand, finger and scissor grips. The animals were then chronically implanted with 64‐channel electrocorticogram arrays positioned over the left premotor, primary motor and somatosensory cortex. Power spectra, reflecting predominantly cortical activity, and phase‐slope index, reflecting the direction of information flux, were studied in beta (16–35 Hz) and gamma (75–100 Hz) bands. Differences related to grip type, epoch (reach, grasp) and cortical area were statistically assessed. Results showed that whole‐hand and scissor grips triggered stronger beta desynchronization than finger grip. Task epochs clearly modulated gamma power, especially for finger and scissor grips. Considering effective connectivity, finger and scissor grips evoked stronger outflow from primary motor to premotor cortex, whereas whole‐hand grip displayed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that fundamental control mechanisms, relying on adjustments of cortical activity and connectivity, are conserved across primates. Consistently, marmosets could represent a good model to investigate primate brain mechanisms.

Highlights

  • The basic forelimb structure evolved to allow remarkable feats of manual precision in primates (Mountcastle, 2005; Padberg et al 2007)

  • We examined the epicortical activity in sensorimotor cortices of two common marmosets performing whole-hand, finger and scissor grips

  • Our results showed that beta power was clearly modulated by grip type, whereas gamma power was more distinctly modulated by task epoch, reflecting adjustments in cortical activity during the task, in particular for finger and scissor grips

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The basic forelimb structure evolved to allow remarkable feats of manual precision in primates (Mountcastle, 2005; Padberg et al 2007). Several studies have been conducted in macaques and humans (Salimi et al 1999a,b; Fogassi et al 2001; Gardner et al 2007; Prabhu et al 2009; Fluet et al 2010; Gharbawie et al 2011), evidence remains sparse on the cortical grasping circuits in phylogenetically distant primates, who generally display more rudimentary manual skills. The regions corresponding to parietal areas 1 and 2 appear to be merged into one (Krubitzer & Kaas, 1990), displaying low responsiveness to tactile stimuli (Krubitzer & Kaas, 1990; Krubitzer & Disbrow, 2008) These features suggest some basic differences in the cortical mechanisms of grasping across species. Comparative studies indicate that the organization of cortical motor areas and, in particular, cortico-cortical connections to M1 are rather similar across species (Burman et al 2014; Bakola et al 2015), hinting that some basic mechanism might be conserved

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.