Abstract

You warn us with appropriate caresses That virtue, humble virtue always wins. Now please before your moral verve oppresses Our middle's empty there it all begins…. For even honest folk may act like sinners unless they've had their customary dinners. From “How to Survive,” Berthold Brecht and Kurt Weill, The Threepenny Opera Is there really an inequality trap? And does corruption rest more upon social strains – high inequality and low trust – than upon strong institutions? I present evidence in this chapter for the framework that I have outlined in Chapter 2. I also show that there may be direct linkages between inequality and corruption – first by introducing a new measure of inequality that also reflects in-group trust and second by examining cross-national surveys on people's perceptions of corruption. Where some groups fare much better than others in a society, corruption will be much higher. This measure of uneven economic development encompasses both economic inequality and the social strains that lead to high in-group trust and low out-group faith in others. This new measure is strongly related to corruption, but also to almost all of the other determinants of corruption, leading to problems in estimating either direct or indirect effects in a statistical model, but suggesting very strong support for an inequality trap.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.