Abstract
In this work, the corrosion behavior of FeCoNi HEA and X100 pipeline steel in a simulated Golmud soil environment was systematically studied utilizing electrochemical tests, surface analysis techniques and immersion measurement. The results indicate that FeCoNi HEA possesses superior anti-corrosion property than X100 steel by comparing the charge transfer resistance (Rct), passive current density (ip) and corrosion morphology. The microstructure and surface film are the principal factors causing the difference in corrosion resistance of the two alloys. More intact, uniform and dense passive film enhances the anti-corrosion performance of the HEA, while the nonprotective, loose and defective corrosion product film covering the surface of X100 steel is not conducive to inhibiting the corrosion of the steel substrate. The appearance of inclusions within the HEA can generate the micro-galvanic corrosion effect with the matrix, which promotes the substrate as an anode to induce pitting. Furthermore, multiple phases of X100 steel exhibits higher electrochemical activity compared to the HEA with a single Face Center Cubic (FCC) phase, which accelerates the corrosion of the steel. Moreover, the matrix of the HEA primarily experiences selected dissolution of Ni element.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
