Corrigendum.

Abstract

The Journal of PhysiologyVolume 595, Issue 11 p. 3677-3678 CorrigendumFree Access Corrigendum This article corrects the following: In vivo and in vitro biophysical properties of hair cells from the lateral line and inner ear of developing and adult zebrafish Jennifer Olt, Stuart L. Johnson, Walter Marcotti, Volume 592Issue 10The Journal of Physiology pages: 2041-2058 First Published online: March 27, 2014 First published: 10 March 2017 https://doi.org/10.1113/JP274128Citations: 1AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Following publication of this article, the authors have notified The Journal of an error in the labelling of four panels in two of the figures. The concentration of MS-222 used for the experiments should have been 0.005%. 0.1% was the concentration of the stock solution that was used. Since the same concentration was used to test both the larval (Figure 3) and juvenile (Figure 5) zebrafish, the authors state that the error does not change the conclusion that MS222 reduces the K+ current in juvenile (Figure 4) but not in larval (Figure 3) lateral line hair cells as reported in the paper. Figure 3. Potassium current recordings from lateral line hair cells of the larval zebrafish before and during the local application of MS-222Open in figure viewerPowerPoint A and B, Example of K+ currents recorded from a hair cell (4 dpf) before (A) and during (B) the superfusion of 0.005% MS-222. Currents were elicited as described in Fig. 2. C, Steady-state (measured at 160 ms) I-V curves obtained from the recordings shown in A and B. Note that MS-222 did not affect the K+ current amplitude, voltage or time dependence. D, Average peak and steady-state amplitude of the K+ current at 0 mV, including those shown in A and B. Recordings are from hair cells of the larval zebrafish neuromast (3.0–5.2 dpf) in the presence (MS-222) and absence (α-Btx: α-bungarotoxin) of the anaesthetic. E, Average steady-state/peak amplitude ratio for the outward K+ current at 0 mV from the same hair cells used in panel D. Figure 5. Current recordings from hair cells of the juvenile lateral line before and during the local application of MS-222Open in figure viewerPowerPoint A–C, Example of K+ currents recorded from hair cells at 21 dpf before (A), during (B) and after (C) the local superfusion of 0.005% MS-222. Note that MS-222 mainly blocks the Ca2+-activated K+ current IK,Ca and the small A-type K+ current IA(s). Ih was not affected by the anaesthetic. Currents were elicited as described in Fig. 2. D and E, Average peak and steady-state I-V curves for the K+ currents recorded before (D) and during (E) 0.005% MS-222 from four hair cells of 21–26 dpf zebrafish, including the recordings shown in panels A and B. F, Peak and steady-state currents extrapolated at 0 mV before (control) and during (MS-222) the superfusion of the anaesthetic for the same 4 cells. Note that the peak current was significantly reduced in MS-222. Recordings in B and C were performed at room temperature. Reference Olt J, Johnson SL & Marcotti W (2014). In vivo and in vitro biophysical properties of hair cells from the lateral line and inner ear of developing and adult zebrafish. J Physiol 592, 2041– 2058. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.265108 Citing Literature Volume595, Issue111 June 2017Pages 3677-3678 FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation