Abstract
Philosophy and Phenomenological ResearchVolume 97, Issue 3 p. 791-791 CorrigendumFree Access Corrigendum This article corrects the following: Fichte on Conscience Owen Ware, Volume 95Issue 2Philosophy and Phenomenological Research pages: 376-394 First Published online: April 1, 2016 First published: 13 November 2018 https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12557AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat The following clarifications refer to Ware (2017). On p. 377, the labels ‘Material Function View’ and ‘Formal Function View’ correspond to what Kosch (2014) calls the ‘criterial’ and ‘non-criterial’ interpretations of Fichte. Strictly speaking, the difference between these views is not whether conscience plays a criterial role, but whether it plays a criterial role at a first or second-order level of practical deliberation. I want to capture this distinction by speaking of ‘material’ and ‘formal’ views instead. On p. 377, in footnote 1, the correct date of Zöller's paper is 2012, as cited in Kosch (2014). On p. 377, in footnote 1, see Kosch (2014: 2, note 4) for a critical overview of this literature. On p. 381, see Kosch (2014: 9) for further discussion of the distinction between the first- and second-order questions. References Kosch, Michelle (2014). ‘Practical Deliberation and the Voice of Conscience in Fichte's 1798 System of Ethics.’ Philosophers’ Imprint 14: 1– 16. Ware, Owen (2017). “Fichte on Conscience.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (2): 376– 394. Zöller, Günter (2012). ‘ The Choice of the Philosopher’, comments on Michelle Kosch, ‘Agency and Self-sufficiency in Fichte's Ethics’, refereed symposium session, Pacific APA. Volume97, Issue3November 2018Pages 791-791 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
