Corrigendum

Abstract

New PhytologistVolume 213, Issue 3 p. 1555-1555 CorrigendumFree Access Corrigendum This article corrects the following: Self/nonself perception and recognition mechanisms in plants: a comparison of self-incompatibility and innate immunity Natasha Sanabria, Daphne Goring, Thorsten Nürnberger, Ian Dubery, Volume 178Issue 3New Phytologist pages: 503-514 First Published online: March 13, 2008 First published: 09 December 2016 https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14365 Author for correspondence: Ian A. Dubery Tel: +27 11 559 2401 Email: [email protected] AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL New Phytologist 178 (2008), 503–514 Since the publication of Sanabria et al. (2008), it has been brought to our attention that a short section of text in this article replicates text that first appeared in an article authored by June Nasrallah (2015, p. 417). The sections in question are on p. 508 of Sanabria et al. and are replicated below, with quotation marks and correct attribution included. We apologize to our readers and to Professor Nasrallah for these errors. References Chookajorn T, Kachroo A, Ripoll DR, Clark AG, Nasrallah JB. 2004. Specificity determinants and diversification of the Brassica self-incompatibility pollen ligand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 911– 917. Dangl JL, Jones JDG. 2001. Plant pathogens and integrated defense responses to infection. Nature 411: 826– 833. Geitmann A, Franklin-Tong VE, Emons AC. 2004. The self-incompatibility response in Papaver rhoeas pollen causes early and striking alterations to organelles. Cell Death and Differentiation 11: 812– 822. Janeway CA, Medzhitov R. 2002. Innate immune recognition. Annual Review of Immunology 20: 197– 216. Jordan ND, Franklin FC, Franklin-Tong VE. 2000. Evidence for DNA fragmentation triggered in the self-incompatibility response in pollen of Papaver rhoeas. Plant Journal 23: 471– 479. Mishima M, Takayama S, Sasaki K, Lee J, Kojima C, Isogai A, Shirakawa M. 2003. Structure of the male determinant factor for Brassica self-incompatibility. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278: 36389– 36395. Nasrallah JB. 2005. Recognition and rejection of self in plant self-incompatibility: comparisons to animal histocompatibility. Trends in Immunology 26: 412– 418. Sanabria N, Goring D, Nürnberger T, Dubery I. 2008. Self/nonself perception and recognition mechanisms in plants: a comparison of self-incompatibility and innate immunity. New Phytologist 178: 503– 514. Thomas SG, Franklin-Tong VE. 2004. Self-incompatibility triggers programmed cell death in Papaver pollen. Nature 429: 305– 309. Corrected text section, p. 508 Parallels exist where plant SI and plant immunity have similar outcomes, such as the elimination of undesirable cells or organisms. Nasrallah (2005, p. 417) states: ‘both immunity and at least some SI systems (the crucifer and possibly the poppy systems) use highly variable receptors to recognize highly variable ligands. In addition, SI systems that have biodestructive activity towards pollen tubes use components that are also used in defense. For example, programmed cell death and other reactions triggered in the incompatible pollen tubes of poppy are also induced during the plant immune response’ (see also Jordan et al., 2000; Dangl & Jones, 2001; Geitmann et al., 2004; Thomas & Franklin-Tong, 2004). Nasrallah (2005, p. 417) notes that ‘Another example relates to the nature of SCR/SP11, the pollen determinant of SI specificity in crucifers. SCR/SP11 is similar in structure (Mishima et al., 2004; Chookajorn et al., 2003) although not in primary sequence, to defensins, the molecules of innate immunity that present a first line of defense to microbial challenge in plants and animals. … the similarity between the two classes of molecules suggests an evolutionary link, albeit a distant one, between crucifer SI and innate immunity.’ The most notable parallels, however, emerge from comparisons of the self-recognition loci and genes of plant SI with those that control self/nonself recognition in a variety of recognition systems, the vertebrate major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in particular (Janeway & Medzhitov, 2002). As outlined by Nasrallah (2005, p. 417) ‘in both plants and animals, and from immunity to reproduction, self/nonself discrimination systems have been molded by similar selective pressures for diversification and coevolution of recognition functions, and by a shared requirement to maintain the genetic linkage of coadapted gene complexes’. Volume213, Issue3February 2017Pages 1555-1555 ReferencesRelatedInformation