Corrigendum.

Abstract

Clinical Physiology and Functional ImagingVolume 38, Issue 3 p. 524-524 CorrigendumFree Access Corrigendum This article corrects the following: Commonly used reference values underestimate oxygen uptake in healthy, 50-year-old Swedish women M. Genberg, B. Andrén, L. Lind, H. Hedenström, A. Malinovschi, Volume 38Issue 1Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging pages: 25-33 First Published online: June 16, 2016 First published: 14 April 2018 https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12515AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL In Genberg et al. (2018), an error was found in the formula used for predicting peak VO2 in women according to SHIP study. The correct formula is now presented in Appendix 1, where the beta coefficient for weight was corrected from 0.0238 to 0.02688. The corrected values for Peak VO2 (% pred SHIP) are 107.7 (19.0) for all subjects and 111.4 (17.3) for women. Table 2 and Figure 2 have been corrected as a result of these changes and the corresponding text sections and sentences in abstract. This does not affect the previous conclusions regarding underestimation of peak oxygen uptake in women, found for all used reference materials. The reference equation that underestimated peak oxygen uptake in women to the largest extent should have been from Hansen–Wasserman and not from SHIP. We apologize for these errors. Reference Genberg M, Andrén B, Lind L, et al. Commonly used reference values underestimate oxygen uptake in healthy, 50-year-old Swedish women. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging (2018); 38: 25– 33. Volume38, Issue3May 2018Pages 524-524 ReferencesRelatedInformation