Corrigendum

Abstract

Regulation & GovernanceVolume 14, Issue 2 p. 388-388 CorrigendumFree Access Corrigendum This article corrects the following: Symmetric and asymmetric motivations for compliance and violation: A crisp set qualitative comparative analysis of Chinese farmers Huiqi Yan, Jeroen Heijden, Benjamin Rooij, Volume 11Issue 1Regulation & Governance pages: 64-80 First Published online: August 11, 2015 First published: 01 April 2020 https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12307AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL In Yan et al. (2017), the coverage of the condition ‘Procedural justice (proj)’ in Table 3 was reported incorrectly as ‘0.79’. The correct coverage is ‘0.70’. The online version of the article has been amended accordingly. The typographical error does not influence the inferences or conclusions presented in the article. The authors have worked with the correct coverage in their analysis (0.70), and because of the low consistency for this condition (0.08) it was excluded as a potential necessary condition for outcome O_type (this is explained in the article). The authors apologize for the typographical error. Reference Yan H, van der Heijden J, van Rooij B (2017) Symmetric and Asymmetric Motivations for Compliance and Violation: A Crisp Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Chinese Farmers. Regulation and Governance 11(1), 64– 80. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rego.12095. Volume14, Issue2April 2020Pages 388-388 ReferencesRelatedInformation