Corrigendum

Abstract

Plant, Cell & EnvironmentVolume 26, Issue 11 p. 1927-1927 Free Access Corrigendum First published: 26 September 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01104.xCitations: 3AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Outline of errors Errors were made in the calculation of relative growth rate and net assimilation rate values in Loveys et al. (2002). Below are the correct values (Table 2) and altered regression equations for Figs 1, 5 and 7 that used values from Table 2. The corrections do not alter the conclusions stated in the published paper; however, future analyses (e.g. meta-analyses) should use the corrected RGR and NAR values. Errors were also made in the symbols listed in the legend of Fig. 3; the corrected legend is provided. Table 2. Corrected mean relative growth rate (RGR, mg g−1 d−1) and net assimilation rate (NAR, g m−2 d−1) values of all 16 species when grown at 18, 23 and 28 °C Species RGR NAR 18 °C 23 °C 28 °C 18 °C 23 °C 28 °C Acacia aneura 23 63 50 7.8 8.4 7.5 Acacia melanoxylon 107 99 99 16.4 10.5 8.5 Achillea millefolium 251 197 191 19.3 14.2 9.2 Achillea ptarmica 187 182 150 15.5 13.2 9.1 Eucalyptus delegatensis 67 150 38 7.7 14.1 2.7 Eucalyptus dumosa 78 111 105 9.8 10.6 8.4 Geum rivale 103 99 116 6.6 5.2 5.1 Geum urbanum 113 166 123 5.5 5.6 5.4 Luzula acutifolia 122 138 57 14.2 14.9 6.4 Plantago euryphylla 60 104 39 6.0 8.5 3.9 Plantago lanceolata 178 267 180 16.0 12.9 9.0 Plantago major 208 142 196 12.6 8.0 9.4 Poa costiniana 87 134 79 8.6 7.7 7.8 Poa trivialis 210 191 131 11.6 6.2 6.6 Silene dioica 215 228 177 14.8 11.0 7.7 Silene uniflora 168 164 160 17.2 13.2 8.1 Figure 1. Corrected equations for the linear regressions of SLA and NAR versus RGR were: SLA18 = 11.0 + 0.044RGR, r2 = 0.23; SLA23 = 11.5 + 0.081RGR, r2 = 0.37; SLA28 = 11.4 + 0.110RGR, r2 = 0.65; NAR18 = 4.1 + 0.062RGR, r2 = 0.70; NAR23 = 5.6 + 0.033RGR, r2 = 0.38; NAR28 = 4.1 + 0.026RGR, r2 = 0.54. Figure 3. Correct symbols for legend: (•), RGR at 18 °C divided by the maximum RGR; (○), RGR at 23 °C divided by the maximum RGR; (▾), RGR at 28 °C divided by the maximum RGR. Figure 5. Corrected equations for the linear regressions of carbon concentration versus RGR were: CC18 = 31.7 + 0.0175RGR, r2 = 0.32; CC23 = 35.0–0.022RGR, r2 = 0.31; CC28 = 35.4–0.030RGR, r2 = 0.72. Figure 7. Corrected equation for the linear regression fitted through all temperature treatments (Ra = 170.0 − 5.195NAR, r2 = 0.24). REFERENCE Loveys B.R., Scheurwater I., Pons T.L., Fitter A.H. & Atkin O.K. (2002) Growth temperature influences the underlying components of relative growth rate: an investigation using inherently fast- and slow-growing plant species. Plant Cell and Environment 25, 975– 988. Citing Literature Volume26, Issue11November 2003Pages 1927-1927 ReferencesRelatedInformation