Corrigendum

Abstract

British Educational Research JournalVolume 44, Issue 2 p. 358-358 CorrigendumFree Access Corrigendum This article corrects the following: The symbolic violence of setting: A Bourdieusian analysis of mixed methods data on secondary students’ views about setting Louise Archer, Becky Francis, Sarah Miller, Becky Taylor, Antonina Tereshchenko, Anna Mazenod, David Pepper, Mary-Claire Travers, Volume 44Issue 1British Educational Research Journal pages: 119-140 First Published online: January 15, 2018 First published: 09 April 2018 https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3337AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat In the following article1, there was an error in the paragraph under ‘Survey’ on page 125. The sentence reads: The ‘Negative views on setting’ subscale contains seven statements, to which students were asked to respond on a five-point scale from strongly disagree (coded 5) to strongly agree (coded 1). The sentence should read: “The ‘Negative views on setting’ subscale contains seven statements, to which students were asked to respond on a five-point scale from strongly disagree (coded 1) to strongly agree (coded 5). Reference Archer, L., Francis, B., Miller, S., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., Mazenod, A., Pepper, D. & Travers, M. (2018) The symbolic violence of setting: A Bourdieusian analysis of mixed methods data on secondary students’ views about setting, Br Educ Res J, 44, 119– 140. Volume44, Issue2April 2018Pages 358-358 ReferencesRelatedInformation