Corrigendum.

Abstract

AddictionVolume 111, Issue 10 p. 1884-1884 CorrigendumFree Access Corrigendum This article corrects the following: Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE): an instrument based on the World Health Organization family of international classifications Gerard M. Schippers, Theo G. Broekman, Angela Buchholz, Maarten W.J. Koeter, Wim Van Den Brink, Volume 105Issue 5Addiction pages: 862-871 First Published online: March 10, 2010 First published: 07 September 2016 https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13532AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE): an instrument based on the World Health Organization family of international classifications Gerard M. Schippers, Theo G. Broekman, Angela Buchholz, Maarten W.J. Koeter and Wim van den Brink The Methods and Techniques paper by Schippers et al. 1, published in the May 2010 issue of Addiction, contained incorrect text. On page 867, ‘Characteristics of the MATE-ICN’ section, the first part reads: The factor structure of the MATE-ICN was assessed using different proposed models. Examination of the fit indices revealed that a model with one general factor and two domain factors, which was consistent with one of the proposed models, provided the best fit to the data: χ2 = 725.875 (df 135), goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.915, adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) = 0.892, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.844, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.823 and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.069. Unfortunately, the figures in this section are wrong. The text should read: The factor structure of the MATE-ICN was assessed using different proposed models. Examination of the fit indices revealed that a model with one general factor and two domain factors, which was consistent with one of the proposed models, provided the best fit to the data: χ2 = 353.396 (df 93), goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.955, adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) = 0.934, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.923, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.901 and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.054. These errors do not in any way influence the conclusions or the discussion of the paper. Nevertheless, the authors apologize for this mistake. Reference 1Schippers G. M., Broekman T. G., Buchholz A., Koeter M. W. J., van den Brink W. Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE): an instrument based on the World Health Organization family of international classifications. Addiction 2010; 105; 862– 71. Volume111, Issue10October 2016Pages 1884-1884 ReferencesRelatedInformation