CORRIGENDUM.

Abstract

CorrigendumCORRIGENDUMPublished Online:19 Feb 2020https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.zdg-3304-corr.2020Original articleMoreSectionsPDF (311 KB)Download PDFDownload PDFPlus ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesGet permissionsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInEmail Kelty TJ, Schachtman TR, Mao X, Grigsby KB, Childs TE, Olver TD, Michener PN, Richardson RA, Roberts CK, Booth FW. Resistance-exercise training ameliorates LPS-induced cognitive impairment concurrent with molecular signaling changes in the rat dentate gyrus. J Appl Physiol 127: 254–263, 2019. First published May 23, 2019; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00249.2019—In Fig. 4, C–F, and in the accompanying legend, units of measure for muscle wet weights were shown incorrectly. The correct Fig. 4 and legend are shown below. In Fig. 5, A and B, and in the third paragraph of results, vehicle (VEH) data were reported incorrectly. In addition, the significance indicated in Fig. 5A for day 1 average latency time for LPS versus VEH and for LPS + RT versus VEH, which is also described in the third paragraph of results, was incorrect. The correct vehicle data, as shown in Fig. 5 and legend below, demonstrate no significant difference in average latency time to enter the escape box between VEH, LPS, and LPS + RT during the familiarization phase (day 1 of testing in week 5). These corrections do not change any of the conclusions of the study.Fig. 4.Effects of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) without exercise (LPS group) or LPS with 6 wk of resistance-exercise training (RT) (LPS + RT group) on lean mass, body weight (BW), and skeletal muscle masses. A: lean mass, as a percentage of total body weight. B: BW over 6 wk of RT. C–F: muscle wet weights are shown as the fraction of grams muscle wet weight/kilograms body weight, *P < 0.05 significantly different from vehicle-injected (VEH) group. #P < 0.05 significantly different from LPS group. 1-way ANOVA, Holm-Sidak post hoc test, with n = 9–10 per group.Download figureDownload PowerPointFig. 5.Effects of resistance-exercise training (RT) on spatial learning and Barnes maze errors 5 wk into RT or sham training. A: latency to locate goal box. B: errors made to locate goal box. #P < 0.05 significantly different from lipopolysaccharide (LPS) group. †P < 0.05 significantly different between day 1 and day 4. 1-way ANOVA, Holm-Sidak post hoc test, n = 9−14 per group.Download figureDownload PowerPointThis article has no references to display. Previous Back to Top FiguresReferencesRelatedInformationRelated articlesResistance-exercise training ameliorates LPS-induced cognitive impairment concurrent with molecular signaling changes in the rat dentate gyrus 15 Jul 2019Journal of Applied Physiology More from this issue > Volume 128Issue 2February 2020Pages 462-462 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2020 the American Physiological Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.zdg-3304-corr.2020PubMed32073335History Published online 19 February 2020 Published in print 1 February 2020 PDF download Metrics Downloaded 359 times