Corrigendum to “Saving large fish through harvest slots outperforms the classical minimum‐length limit when the aim is to achieve multiple harvest and catch‐related fisheries objectives”

Abstract

Fish and FisheriesVolume 22, Issue 6 p. 1412-1412 CORRIGENDUMFree Access This article corrects the following: Saving large fish through harvest slots outperforms the classical minimum-length limit when the aim is to achieve multiple harvest and catch-related fisheries objectives Robert N. M. Ahrens, Micheal S. Allen, Carl Walters, Robert Arlinghaus, Volume 21Issue 3Fish and Fisheries pages: 483-510 First Published online: January 29, 2020 First published: 22 October 2021 https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12609AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat In the article by Ahrens et al. (2020) the authors have identified some errors in the published version. When trying to recode the model presented in Table 1, a few erroneous equations were noted. These errors were only in the printed version of the paper. The equations in the code generating the results were correct, which is why all results and conclusions remain unaffected by this Corrigendum. In Table 1, equations 4a, 4b, 11a and 11b should read as; REFERENCE Ahrens, R., Allen, M. S., Walters, C., & Arlinghaus, R. (2020). Saving large fish through harvest slots outperforms the classical minimum-length limit when the aim is to achieve multiple harvest and catch-related fisheries objectives. Fish and Fisheries, 21, 483– 510. Volume22, Issue6November 2021Pages 1412-1412 ReferencesRelatedInformation