Corrigendum to: Growth of white spruce underplanted beneath spaced and unspaced aspen stands in northeastern B.C.—10 year results

Abstract

Establishing white spruce ( Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) by planting it under established aspen ( Populus tremuloides Michx.), stands has substantial potential as a technique for regenerating boreal mixedwood stands. The presence of an aspen overstory serves to ameliorate frost and winter injury problems and suppresses understory vegetation that may compete with white spruce. In this study we examine the growth of white spruce during the first 10 years after being planted underneath a 39-year-old stand of trembling aspen following thinning and fertilization. Results indicate successful establishment and reasonable growth rates of white spruce planted under thinned and unthinned aspen stands, even with aspen basal area of 51 m 2 ha −1. Thinning of overstory aspen to 1000 or 2000 stems ha −1 did not increase light reaching seedlings, but did result in improvements in light above the shrub layer and in diameter and height growth of the underplanted seedlings. However, these increases in growth of underplanted spruce may not justify the expense of thinnings. Fertilization of these stands prior to planting had no effect on spruce growth. Growth of spruce underplanted at this site near Fort Nelson was similar to that at two other stands near Dawson Creek, B.C. Information on treatment effects on light, beam fraction, air temperature, and soil temperature are presented. Measurements of light obtained using LAI-2000 and hemispherical photography were compared with those obtained from hourly PPFD measurements. Results indicate that while both methods provide estimates of transmittance that are highly correlated with those provided by actual light measurements, they provide substantial underestimates of actual light levels.